Pyetje/pergjigjie mbi etimologjine dhe perberien e fjaleve

[Orakulli]

Zakonisht,mosdija ndjek nje rruge te formulimit shume te pergjithshem te mendimit si dhe te palidhur ne shume drejtimshim pyetsor.
Armikja e betuar e mosdijes eshte llogjika.
Sikur te nisemi prej saj,mund te shkruajme:
1.Zoti eshte i gjithefuqishem.Ai ka krijuar gjithcka.
3.Zoti ka fuqi te ndryshoje gjithcka.
4.E keqja ekziston.
5.Zoti nuk vepron per ta eleminuar ate.
6.Zoti nuk ekziston.
Keto jane mendimit e nje filozofi te shekullit te 19-te(me sa mbaj mend).


Zhvillimi i gjuhes,te pakten i asaj Shqipe,tregon qe Darvini ka te drejte.Nje fillim ka qene format njeqelizore gjuhesore;nje tingull-nje kuptim,forma dyqelizore-nje rrokje,format treqelizore-dybashtingellore-nje zanore,dy zanore-njebashtingellore,format,katerqelizore-dy rrokje e me radhe.Me kombinacionet e tyre vime tek oraganizmat fjale.Niset nga nje element dhe perfundojme ne nje organizem te komplikuar,e cila eshte gjuha me kombinacionet e 36 elementeve baze,shtate zanoreve dhe 29 bashtingelloreve.Sikur Darvini te mos kishte te drejte,gjuha Shqipe nuk do te kishte 27 forma te shumesit,por vetem nje,ate te Fese.Po te ndjekim llogjiken e ndertimit te fese ne nuk mund te percaktojme dot gjinine,femerore apo mashkullore.Kjo,sepse Zoti si elementi me i rendesishem i i shkruar ne te,por njekohesisht dhe krijesa me i rendesishme i gjithesise,nuk eshte i percaktuar cfare gjinie ka.
Vetem pak njohuri te kesh per ecurine e veglave te punes se njeriut gjate evolucionit te tij,do te kuptosh shume lehte qe Darvini ka shume te drejte.Studimi i llojeve te parardhsve tane tregon qe ata ne fillim ishin ne gjendje te artikulonin disa tinguj te thjeshte dhe gradualisht deri tek parardhesi i njeriut modern, qe ishte aftesine te artikulonte e ndertonte nje numer te konzitershum komizanum te tyre.Vete historia e gjuhes se folur dhe te shkruar tregon vertetesine e teorise se Darvinet.Gjuha eshte nji organizem i gjalle,brenda ndertimit tone bologjike(nuk i shpeton dote formules se Darvinit,edhe jo vetem ajo).Sikur te kishte ardhur njehere e mire ne nje forme te pandryshueshme dhe te arrire(Sa mire do te ishte),sot nuk do te kishim mijera gjuhe dhe shume here me teper dialekte,por vetem nje gjuhe,ate te krijuesit tone,Zotit.Kur ai na krijoi ne gjendjen e pandryshueshme,sic jemi sot,na dha dhe nje gjuhe te caktuar.Kete nuk e percaktojne dot fete.Cila ishte gjuha qe ai krijoi??Mire,ne nuk kemi ndryshuar,po gjuha pse eshte e ndryshme?Gjashte mije nuk jane pak.kane qene shume here me teper para nje shekulli.Kush e ndryshoi gjuhen qe na dha Zoti ne fillim???E ndryshuam ne qe dolem nga rruga e tij?Po,kush ne?Katoliket?Ata jane shume besimtare,por prape kane shume gjuhe.Kush e humbi i pari gjuhen e zotit?Kush e ndryshoi i pari gjuhen e Zotit?Vete Zoti?
Mosdijen,ose mungesen e llogjikes,ose me thjeshte e aftesise per te menduar vetesisht, bukur e shfrytezojne disa per te ndertuar,ne kundershtim me deshiren e zotit te vertet (nese ekziston),njerez budallenj dhe te mjere.Sot nuk do te kishim PC-ra dhe makina etj, qe persosen gjithmone e me teper,por do te mjaftoheshim me ndezjen e nje zjarri me gur stralli ne pyllin afer Kishes se Shen Balit.
Darvini na mesoi neve si te analizojme dhe llogjikojme per nje dicka qe eshte shume e dukshme dhe shume e kuptuesheme.Jemi ne,njerezimi i sotem qe kemi ende para syve perde te trasha te erreta,te cilat veshtirresojne shikimin dhe mendimin njerezor.
Une,per vete,e pranoj ekzistencen e zotit.Jam vetem kunder njerzeve qe duan te shfrytezojne emrin e tij per te shendruar njerezimin ne nje qenie gjithmone e me te paditur,ne kundershtim me deshiren evolutive te tij.
Cfare thote shkenca,kuptohet ,pa perdorur shume fjale te pergjithshme.Ju mund te lexoni:
Ethiopian desert yields oldest hominid skeleton

By Robert Sanders, Media Relations | 01 October 2009

BERKELEY — Nearly 17 years after plucking the fossilized tooth of a new human ancestor from a pebbly desert in Ethiopia, an international team of scientists today (Thursday, Oct. 1) announced their reconstruction of a partial skeleton of the hominid, Ardipithecus ramidus, which they say revolutionizes our understanding of the earliest phase of human evolution.

Leslea HluskoOn the trail of our ancestors
A Q&A with paleoanthropologist Leslea Hlusko
The female skeleton, nicknamed Ardi, is 4.4 million years old, 1.2 million years older than the skeleton of Lucy, or Australopithecus afarensis, the most famous and, until now, the earliest hominid skeleton ever found. Hominids are all fossil species closer to modern humans than to chimps and bonobos, which are our closest living relatives.

"This is the oldest hominid skeleton on Earth," said Tim White, University of California, Berkeley, professor of integrative biology and one of the co-directors of the Middle Awash Project, a team of 70 scientists that reconstructed the skeleton and other fossils found with it. "This is the most detailed snapshot we have of one of the earliest hominids and of what Africa was like 4.4 million years ago."

White and the team will publish the results of their analysis in 11 papers in the Oct. 2 issue of the journal Science, which has Ardi on the cover. They announced their findings at press conferences held simultaneously today in Washington, D.C., and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

New view of hominid ancestry
Fossils of the Human FamilyFossils of the Human Family: Timeline
This timeline shows the fossils upon which our current understanding of human evolution is based. The new fossil skeleton of Ardipithecus ramidus, nicknamed Ardi, fills a large gap before the Lucy skeleton, Australopithecus afarensis, but after the hominid line split from the line that led to today's chimpanzees. (Science magazine)

The team's reconstruction of the 4-foot-tall skeleton and of Ardi's environment — a woodland replete with parrots, monkeys, bears, rhinos, elephants and antelope — alters the picture scientists have had of the first hominid to arise after the hominid line that would eventually lead to humans split about 6 million years ago from the line that led to living chimpanzees.

Based on a thorough analysis of the creature's foot, leg and pelvis bones, for example, the scientists concluded that Ardi was bipedal — she walked on two legs — despite being flat-footed and likely unable to walk or run for long distances.

In part, this primitive ability to walk upright is because Ardi was still a tree-dweller, they said. She had an opposable big toe, like chimpanzees, but was probably not as agile in the trees as a chimp. Unlike chimps, however, she could have carried things while walking upright on the ground, and would have been able to manipulate objects better than a chimp. And, contrary to what many scientists have thought, Ardi did not walk on her knuckles, White said.

"Ardi was not a chimpanzee, but she wasn't human," stressed White, who directs UC Berkeley's Human Evolution Research Center. "When climbing on all fours, she did not walk on her knuckles, like a chimp or gorilla, but on her palms. No ape today walks on its palms."

Ardi's successor, Lucy, was much better adapted for walking on the ground, suggesting that "hominids became fundamentally terrestrial only at the Australopithecus stage of evolution," he said.

Based on Ardi's small, blunt, upper canine teeth, the team also argues that the males of that species did not engage in the same fearsome, teeth-baring threat behavior common in chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans. Instead, they must have had a more amicable relationship, the scientists said, implying that several pair-bonded couples lived together in social units. Males may even have helped in gathering food for sharing.

"The novel anatomy that we describe in these papers fundamentally alters our understanding of human origins and early evolution," said anatomist and evolutionary biologist C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University, a scientist with the project. In a summary article in Science, Lovejoy wrote that these and other behaviors "would have substantially intensified male parental investment — a breakthrough adaptation with anatomical, behavioral, and physiological consequences for early hominids and for all of their descendants, including ourselves."

Earlier fossil discoveries
Six members of the Middle Awash Project comment on the significance of the skeleton in understanding human origins. (Primary Pictures Inc./Science/Discovery Channel)

Until now, the oldest fossil skeleton of a human ancestor was the 3.2-million-year-old partial skeleton of Lucy, discovered in the Afar depression of Ethiopia, near Hadar, in 1974 and named Au. afarensis.

In 1992, however, while surveying a site elsewhere in the Afar, near the village of Aramis, 140 miles northeast of Addis Ababa, Middle Awash Project scientist Gen Suwa discovered a tooth from a more primitive creature more than 1 million years older than Lucy. After more fossils of the creature were found in the area from some 17 individuals, Suwa, White and project co-leader Berhane Asfaw published the discovery in the journal Nature in 1994.

Although that first paper initially conservatively placed the chimp-like creature in the Australopithecus genus with Lucy, the team subsequently created a new genus — Ardipithecus — for the hominid because of the fossils' significantly more primitive features.

After preparing their first report, the scientists continued to find more Ar. ramidus fossils in the Aramis area. A hand-bone discovered in 1994 by project scientist Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a paleontologist and curator at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, eventually led the team to the partial skeleton now known as Ardi, which they excavated during three subsequent field seasons. The skeleton was disarticulated and scattered, and broken into smaller pieces: 125 fragments of skulls, teeth, arms, hands, the pelvis, legs and feet. In addition to this skeleton, the area yielded a total of 110 other catalogued specimens representing body parts of at least 36 other Ardipithecus individuals.

After the bones were excavated at the site, they were molded and painstakingly removed from their protective plaster jackets in the laboratory in Addis Ababa, where they were then photographed and reconstructed. Micro-CT scanners were used to study the inner and outer anatomy of the bones and teeth, and scanning electron microscopes were used to study the structure and surface details. The 5,000 micro-CT slices through the broken skull allowed the team to reconstruct it on a computer and then "print" it on a 3-D stereolithic printer at the University of Tokyo. A cast of Ardi's skull, along with video and comparisons, can be seen now in the Human Evolution display on the second floor of UC Berkeley's Valley Life Sciences Building.

Many scientists weigh in on Ardi

In all, 47 scientists from 10 countries contributed to the 11 Science papers, providing detailed analyses of the feet, pelvis, teeth and general anatomy of Ar. ramidus and reconstructions of the geology and biology of the area where Ardi lived 4.4 million years ago. Two of the papers analyze more than 150,000 plant and animal fossils — including 6,000 individually catalogued vertebrate fossils — to reconstruct the large and small mammals and birds of the area. Among these are 20 species new to science, including shrews, bats, rodents, hares and carnivores.
Ardi on the cover of Science magazineThe Oct. 2, 2009, Science cover photo depicts the skeleton of Ardi, a female hominid dating from 4.4 million years ago. An international research team reconstructed the skeleton from 125 fossil pieces discovered in the desert of the Middle Awash valley in Ethiopia. (Science magazine)

"We had to do a lot of work to bring this world back to life, but by merging the skeletal information with the data on biology and geology, we end up with a very, very high-resolution snapshot of Ardi's world," White said. "It was a very cold case investigation."

CTs of the tooth enamel, for example, revealed that Ardi was an omnivore, eating a diet different from that of living African apes, such as chimps, which eat primarily fruit, and gorillas, which eat primarily leaves, stems and bark. The team suggests that Ardipithecus spent a lot of time on the ground looking for nutritious plants, mushrooms, invertebrates and perhaps small vertebrates.

It wasn't until 1 million years after Ardi that hominids like Lucy were able to range extensively into the savannas and develop the robust premolar and molar teeth with thick enamel needed to eat hard seeds and roots. One of these species then started scavenging and using stone tools to butcher larger mammals for meat, "paving the way to the evolution and geographic expansion of Homo, including later elaboration of technology and expansion of the brain," White said.

White said Ardi, who probably weighed about 110 pounds, had a brain close to the size of today's chimpanzees — one-fifth that of Homo sapiens — and a small face. Males and females were about the same size. The hominid's lack of resemblance to either chimp or modern humans indicates that the last common ancestor of apes and humans looked like neither, he said, and that both lines have evolved significantly since they split 6 million years ago.

White admits that the relationship between Ar. ramidus and the Australopithecus fossils the team has found about 80 meters higher in the strata of the Ethiopian desert is tentative. Nevertheless, he said Ardi's species could be the direct ancestor of Lucy's species, which could be the direct ancestor of modern humans. Without additional fossil evidence, however, connecting the individual or species dots is hazardous, White said.

"Ardipithecus ramidus is only known from this one productive site in Ethiopia," White said. "We hope others will find more fossils, in particular fossils from the period of 3 to 5 million years ago, to test this hypothesis of descent."

Among the many team members and co-authors who worked on the series of Science papers are geologist and Middle Awash team co-director Giday WoldeGabriel of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); Leslea Hlusko, associate professor of integrative biology at UC Berkeley; and Paul Renne, director of the Berkeley Geochronology Center and an adjunct professor of earth and planetary science at UC Berkeley. Many of the 47 authors are UC Berkeley faculty, postdocs, students and alumni, reflecting the strength and tradition of human origins research at UC Berkeley for the last century.

The Middle Awash research effort is supported by the National Science Foundation and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics of the University of California at LANL.

Teoria e darvinit nuk ka aspak te beje me dogmen e shkurter nje fjali "Njeriu e ka prejardhjen nga majmuni".Lexoni librin e tij,per te kuptuar me mire zbulimin e tij.
Te kundershtosh Darvinin duke thene qe:Njeriu nuk ka ndryshuar prej fillimit (feja)dhe shkencetaret zbuluan se fundi qe preardhja e njeriut nuk vjen nga majmuni(shkenca),eshte shume pak dhe pak me teper se nje kontradikte.Do te thote qe as feja nuk njihet dhe as shkenca nuk dihet.

[Kolivilor]

Për fjalën Bardhë dhe Verdhë kam një mendim, se në kohëra të hershme tingujt "thë" janë përdorur në vens të prapashtesës së sotme -të.

Psh sipas gramatikës së sotme do të duhej të thuhej "i bortë" që dmth ngjyrë bore, ose "i vertë" dmth ngjyrë vere.

Atëherë me siguri duhet të ketë qenë prapashtesa -thë, i borthë, i verthë, që më pas është shëndrru në dh.

Këtu diku sillet edhe çështja e fjalëve mat, mas, për të matur, dhe fjalës i madh, Emathi, Makedonia etj. Pastaj
"arrit", "ardhur", -
ngordh, i ngurtë -
heeeej, hedh -
vë, për të vënë, vath (vath në vesh) -
mbaj, mbath -
rreze, rreth
gjej, gjethe
grryej, grethi (grerëz)
etj

[Orakulli]

Jane shume te thjeshta,por na i kane komplikuar punen "gjuhetaret profesioniste" si dhe sheknca "etimologjike" dhe ne disa raste dhe fonetika zyrtare.
Po ju marr vetem nje rast te thjeshte:GRERëZ
Fillojme me tingullin qe leshon ky izsekt:Eshte "Z(ë)">ye cilin e kemi brenda njesise,simboli i fundit.
Vazhdojme me gjeometrine e objektit;eshte simboli vizatimor g.
Grerëza eshte bashkimi i koceptit tingellor me konceptin vuzatimor te saj.Eshte "GZ".R-eshte shruar me vone si element ndihmes.Njesoj si ne shqipen,qe kuptohet nga folesit e sotem te saj:Ra 2.Cfare teze te ra ne provim?Kur flitet drejtuar perosnit,ne veten e dyte,sikur te bashkebidehote me njesine,te flitet me te eshte:re GZ.Une rashe "a",ti RE "b",Ai ra "C"....Re(a,o,i,u) perdoren si ndihmese ndertimore per te ritur dallueshmerine gjate shtimit te njrsive te reja.Fjala eshte ndertuar njesoj sic ndertohet fjalia.Ne kuptojme fjaline sot.Dikur fjali ishte cdo fjale.Dikur kuptonin cdo elemente perberes te vecante te cdo fjale,njesoj sic ne kuptojme cdo njesi perberese te nje fjalie.
Gjuha Shqipe eshte :tingull-gjeomteri-matematike.
Eshte gjuha qe perdor me shume matematiken se cdo gjuhe tjeter.Gjuha Shqipe ka njesi te shkurtera dhe fjalia jep kuptueshmeri te larte me minimumin e tyre.Gjuha shqipe numeron,mbledh,shumezon,pjeston,,vizaton dhe kendon.Kur hyn brenda saj,kupton qe ke hyre brenda nje dickaje te pabesueshme,hyjnore.Eshte nje mrekulli.
Prandaj,gjuha etruske nuk ka per tu zberthuer kurre nese nuk zbulohen kodet e Shqipes.
Prandaj,gjuha greke e vjeter dhe latine,nuk do te kuptohen kurre si jane ndertuar po nuk u vendos ne vendin gjuhesor qe i perket gjuha Shqipe.Mosperfillaj,sharjja,tallja ndaj saj tregon vetem shkallen me te ulet,jo te gjuhesise se sotme,por te njerezimit te sotem.Tregon degradimin e tij mendimor.

[Zeus10]

Kam pershtypjen se rrenja e fjales grerez eshte onomotopema gr-i-j qe gjendet dhe ne fjale te tilla si grindem, gricem, i/e egri etj. Prapashtesa (e)z eshte ne shqipe nje prapashtese qe shenon objekte te vegjel ose/dhe aktive ose per perkedhelje psh: blet-ez, cupez, kukellz, loderz etj.

[Orakulli]

Po Miz(ë)?Mos kerko te prgjithesosh "z" sic bejne gjuhetaret e sotem.Po te heqesh "z"-ne ne Mize,matematikisht del "mi".Niu ka nje kodik tjeter,miza ka nje kodik tjeter.Miu-ka kodik matematikor,qe shprehet me njesine "i vogel".E shpreh vetem nje lemente i tij"i"-ja.Ndersa "m" kuptohet [p te kuptosh perdorime e saj sot;"më -III. parafj. Përdoret së bashku me një emër e
përemër në rasën kallëzore ose me një numëror
për të shënuar:
1. Vendin a hapësirën, ku ndodhet dikush a diçka
ose ku kryhet një veprim; në. Iku (mori, i doli) më
të djathtë (më të majtë). I ra më të tatëpjeti (më

Dicka reth "Z"-se.Nje nga matricat baze kryesore te formimit te gjuhes Shqipe.
Per cdo rast te vecante ajo ka nje drejtim te ndryshem kuptimor.Ajo ka me shume se nje kuptim.Varet nga objekti qe perdoret.Eshte matematike-gjeometrike-note muzikore.
Z-eshte mbyllja e nje dickaje.Nje nga kuptimet e saj.Ose,Z-ja eshte ne fund,mbyllese ne kuptimin mbarues te nje sasie..etj.Por,kjo eshte ideore.Kur ndertohen koceptet abstrakte,ajo merr nje rendesi te vecante.Vecse ngaterrohet sot,ose veshtire te kuptohet,,sepse gjuha Shqipe sot i ka transformuar(te ra(re) zë-eshte koncepti iti i latinshtes se famshe "transformoj") fonetikisht ne ;s,sh,c.
Ajo,ne gjuhen shqipe rotullohet e riperseriret.Shpreh sensin e rotullimit ne kater drejtimet.Shpreh ecjen ne nje drejtim te caktuar.Shpreh zenien e nje dickaje(lindje).E dhjetra te tjera...
Eshte e lehte ta gjesh ate,vetem kur kemi te bejme me emrat te objekteve konkrete.

[Zeus10]

Po eshte e vertete qe mi dhe mize kane te perbashket njesine mi, ku m-ja eshte fillesa per madhesine dhe masen, kurse i-ja eshte ajo qe e ben kete njesi treguese te nje objekti te vogel, kurse z-ja ne fund mund te tregoje zukatje, dhe ndoshta ate mund ta tregoje dhe tek fjala grerez ose bletez, por kjo nuk e perjashton ate qe ne disa raste mbyllesja z-ë tregon, vogelsi ose perdoret per te treguar nje objekt me dashuri ose perkedheli.

[Orakulli]

Enigmatikat e shqipes:
zhangellon,Zhurm(e),shurdh,zhuritur,zhubrosje,zhuber,zhele,zheg,zhdervjell,zhdep,zhape,zhan,zymtoj,zverk,zvarritje,zukat,zukame,zorre,..